Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Torgenson

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 30, 2024No. 2:17-cv-00328Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION DANIEL ORTIZ, ORDER AND MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Case No. 2:17-cv-328-TC SARAH TORGENSON, et al., Judge Tena Campbell Defendants. In his amended complaint (ECF No. 105), Plaintiff Daniel Ortiz asserts violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This court previously granted summary judgment to all defendants in this action (ECF No. 70), but that decision was vacated by the Tenth Circuit as it related to the retaliation claim against two defendants…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. White v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API