Legal Opinion

People v. Saito

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 19, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harvey Glasser, J.

The defendant is charged with violating the Building Code (Administrative Code of City of New York § 27-101 et seq.) by operating a place of assembly without a place of assembly (PA) permit, emergency lighting, a self-closing exit door, and a capacity sign.

The defendant moves to dismiss the information in the interest of justice arguing that he was never the owner, manager or person in control of the premises. Rather, "Mr. Saito was merely a waiter and greeter of the tenant/business then occupying the premises,” and was served the summons "because he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MacFarlene Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
  2. People v. ViszokaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BeecherValley Stream Justice Court · 1992
  2. People v. ButtCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  3. People v. Long Island RailroadValley Stream Justice Court · 2014
  4. People v. FrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  5. People v. MinoriValley Stream Justice Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API