Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Company v. Gibson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 28, 2008No. S07A1365.; S07X1389.; S07A1367.; S07X1368PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELTON, Justice.
These multiple appeals arise from a jury verdict in favor of Artumus Gibson, as the surviving spouse and Administrator of his wife's estate (hereinafter collectively "Gibson"), against William Burns, Ford Motor Company ("Ford"), and Draw-Tite, Inc. ("Draw-Tite"), in connection with a car accident that resulted in his wife's death. In Case No. S07A1365, Ford challenges the trial court's order requiring Ford to produce certain crash-test documents during discovery and the subsequent sanctions imposed by the trial court in connection with Ford's failure to produce these…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chrysler Corp. v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Louisiana Forum Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Bailey v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Medical Security Group, Inc. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Resurgens, P.C. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- An v. Active Pest Control South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- CITY OF ATLANTA v. HOTELS.COM, L.P. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- VINEYARD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BAILEY Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.