Legal Opinion

Reo Atlanta Co. v. Stern

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 16, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. Action by the Reo Atlanta Company against Joseph Stern to recover an automobile.

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, District Judge.

Since January, 1920, an automobile, title to which had been retained by Reo Atlanta Company by a recorded instrument, was seized in the hands of the purchasers and libeled for condemnation; the libel stating that the car had been used by named persons in the removal, deposit, and concealment of distilled spirits on which the tax was due and unpaid, with the purpose of defrauding the government of the tax. After due procedure, judgment of condemnation was rendered by default, the car advertised for sale, and bought by the defendant Stern. Thereafter the persons alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. One Haynes AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  2. United States v. One Essex Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1920
  3. United States v. One Essex Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1921
  4. Duvall v. DycheDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. AccardoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  2. United States v. TorresDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1923
  3. United States v. One Chevrolet CoupéDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1925
  4. United States v. One Ford AutomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
  5. Byrd Motor Co. v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API