Legal Opinion
Proctor v. Macdonald
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 7, 1997No. 95-061PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Winslow Macdonald, trustee of the Milford Elm Street Trust, appeals from the decision of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) granting the plaintiffs, Samuel Proctor, Jr. and Barry A. Greene d/b/a Proctor & Greene, commissions on certain commercial leases. We affirm.
The trial court found the following facts. The defendant owns commercial and retail rental property in Milford. The plaintiffs are real estate brokers. The plaintiffs and defendant began doing business together during the early 1980s, and entered into an exclusive listing agreement for the property on February 15,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. KhourySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Ives v. Manchester Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Goodwin Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- McIntire v. WoodallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Chicago Investments, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Collision Communications, Inc. v. P Nokia Solutions and Networks OYDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025
- Collision Communications, Inc. v. Nokia CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025
- Collision Communications, Inc. v. Nokia Solutions and Networks OYDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2026