Legal Opinion

State Highway Board v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1930No. 20691PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “While, as a general rule, a county is not liable to suit unless there is a law which in express terms or by necessary implication so declares, yet the appropriate law may be found in the constitutional provision that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation being first paid. When private property is taken or damaged by the authorities of a county, or by their duly authorized servant, for the use of the public, without just compensation being first paid, a right of action arises in favor of the owner of the property, which may be enforced by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scearce v. Mayor of GainesyilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Elbert County v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Rheberg v. Grady CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Ketchum v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. McKenzie v. Foy & ShemwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Tounsel v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Renninger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. C. F. I. Construction Co. v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API