Coxe v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
This appeal of Charles F. Coxe from his conviction in Superior Court of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol challenges the constitutionality of 21 Del.C. § 4176(a), which the appellant alleges provides for a “conclusive presumption of guilt based upon a chemical reading.”
The statute, 21 Del.C. § 4176(a), as amended June 20, 1970, after setting forth the penalty for a first offense and each subsequent like offense, provides in pertinent part:
“ * * * Any person who drives, operates or has in actual physical control a motor vehicle while such person’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rickards v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
- State v. ChildressArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. ProtokowiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
3Cited by44 opinions
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.