Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Balenger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1997No. 702PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals the April 3, 1996 order granting appellee, Thomas Balen-ger, a new trial. At issue is whether the prosecutor’s amorous relationship with appel-lee’s former girlfriend was a conflict of interest requiring the grant of a new trial. We agree with the PCRA court that there was a conflict of interest and that all prior counsel were ineffective for failing to raise this issue. Hence, we affirm.

The prosecutor at appellee’s trial, William Jones, Jr., began a meretricious relationship with Lana Conte prior to the institution of the charges at issue in this case.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. EskridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. TodaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. CraverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. MarizzaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. SimsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. MeslerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API