Commonwealth v. Balenger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
The Commonwealth appeals the April 3, 1996 order granting appellee, Thomas Balen-ger, a new trial. At issue is whether the prosecutor’s amorous relationship with appel-lee’s former girlfriend was a conflict of interest requiring the grant of a new trial. We agree with the PCRA court that there was a conflict of interest and that all prior counsel were ineffective for failing to raise this issue. Hence, we affirm.
The prosecutor at appellee’s trial, William Jones, Jr., began a meretricious relationship with Lana Conte prior to the institution of the charges at issue in this case.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. EskridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. TodaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. CraverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MarizzaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. SimsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MeslerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.