Legal Opinion

Distefano v. Lamborn

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 7, 1951No. 271PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

Third Party Plaintiffs concede the general principle that no right of contribution exists between joint tort-feasors, but argue that the Rule is subject to numerous exceptions, among which is that where the negligences charged are passive, in contra-distinction to deliberate or willful, an action of contribution may be maintained by a joint tort-feasor who has paid all or more than his pro rata share of the judgment. This exception to the general rule, they contend, is applicable here.

Any discussion of the subject necessarily leads back to the case of Merryweather v. Nixon, 101…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  5. Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Shiflet v. EllerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Monacelli v. GrimesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. Village of El Portal v. City of Miami ShoresSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. Price v. All American Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Clark v. Teeven Holding Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API