Legal Opinion
Morrin v. Robert White Engineering Works
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 5, 1905PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. The opinion in the court below is reported in (C. C.) 138 Eed. 68, where the facts are fully stated, and all of the leading authorities collected. The validity of claim 2 of the Morrin patent in suit, No. 463,307, was sustained in Morrin v. Lawler (O. C.) 90 Fed. 285, and Morrin v. Edison Electric Co. (C. C.) 90 Fed. 285, affirmed 99 Fed. 977, 40 C. C. A. 204.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, Circuit Judge.
The. validity of claim two of the Morrin patent No. 463,307 having been sustained by this court is no longer the subject of controversy. It is as follows:
“2. A steam generator having an upright generator-cylinder provided with tiers of generating-tubes b, of loop-like form, said loop having a pear-shaped outline when seen in plan, and each loop having at one side a lobe formed by the short out-curve at bx and the short in-curve at bxx, the planes of the loops in the tubes being set obliquely to the axis of the generator-cylinder, substantially as set forth.”
We fully concur…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Southwestern Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Williams v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Hughes Tool Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- F. F. Slocomb & Co. v. A. C. Layman Mach. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1915
- Hughes Tool Co. v. United MacH. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.