Legal Opinion

Braunworth v. Braunworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

It would seem clear that under the present

circumstances and until the agreement for support is set aside for adequate reasons, its validity cannot be questioned, and the court would have no power to fix, by way of temporary alimony, a larger sum than that fixed in the agreement. Goldman v. Goldman (282 N. Y. 296) does not hold to the contrary, but, instead, reaffirms the rule of law established in the prior cases which are cited in the Goldman decision, to the effect that until the contract is impeached, the court will not compel the husband to pay a larger sum than the wife agreed to accept.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Braunworth v. BraunworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Wimpfheimer v. WimpfheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Parkas v. ParkasNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API