Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Capitol City Trade and Technical School

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 1989No. CV-23455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, Joyce Bailey, Nancy Hanus, Jose Luis Hinojosa, Eugenia Ortiz, Dee Pendergaft, Chris Powell, and Demetria O’Loughlin, filed their motion for extension of time to file cost bond on May 31, 1989. 1 Tex.R.App.P.Ann. 41(a)(2) (Supp.1989). After this Court submitted and dismissed their motion, appellants filed their motion for reconsideration on cost bond. We will overrule the motion for reconsideration.

Rule 41(a)(2) provides that an appellate court may extend the time for filing a cost bond

if such bond ... is filed ... not later than fifteen days after the last day allowed and, within…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Arkla Equipment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Owen v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  2. MANN III v. Franklin Federal BancorpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API