Legal Opinion

Holton v. Guinn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided September 28, 1896No. 1,964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

This cause is submitted on the proofs and the briefs of counsel. The important question to be decided is, were Lloyd and Guinn eo-pariners in business; and, if so, did the land in question belong’ to the parties as partners, so that on the death of Lloyd the right of possession thereto devolved upon Guinn, as surviving partner, for the purpose of winding up and administering the partnership estate? Real estate may, the same as personalty, become the subject of partnership. It is wholly a. matter of intention and agreement among the owners of the land. It may be created…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Insurance Co. v. Brune's AssigneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Donnell v. HarsheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Thompson v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. McCrary v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
  2. Union Savings & Loan Co. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hudson v. FrenchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API