Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Fusco

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 24, 2014No. 57/13Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kevin J. Shannon, et al. v. Mafalda Fusco et al., No. 57, September Term, 2013 TORTS – NEGLIGENCE – INFORMED CONSENT – MATERIAL RISK In discerning which risks are “material,” thereby requiring a physician to discloses them to effectively obtain a patient’s informed consent, significant factors include the severity of the risk and the likelihood with which it will occur. TORTS – NEGLIGENCE – INFORMED CONSENT – NECESSITY FOR EXPERT TESTIMONY In an informed consent cause of action, expert testimony is necessary to establish the material risks of the medical treatment. TORTS – NEGLIGENCE -…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Blackwell v. WyethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API