Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barnes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 369PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s first trial, following a denial of his motion to suppress, resulted in a mistrial when the jury could not reach a verdict. Appellant’s second trial, also before a jury, resulted in his conviction of burglary of a State Liquor store and aggravated assault. The resulting judgment of sentence was affirmed per curiam. Commonwealth v. Barnes, 223 Pa. Super. 705, 296 A.2d 53 (1972). This appeal is from a denial of PCHA relief. Appellant raises four claims of ineffectiveness of counsel. Three of these claims are without merit, but since the PCHA judge failed to consider the fourth claim,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SlavikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. KahleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SweitzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. KlaricSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. WeaklandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. WatersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API