Legal Opinion

State v. Eddington

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1967No. 5363 and 5364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

The issue presented by this consolidated appeal is the legal sufficiency of the evidence upon which a grand jury acted in returning two indictments charging embezzlement. One (Case No. 5363) alleged that Eddington and Frisby embezzled $100,000 from the People’s Investment Company. The other (Case No. 5364) charges that Eddington, Wright, and Frisby embezzled $200,000 from the Mark Twain Life Insurance Company. Eddington and Wright challenged the sufficiency of the evidence through petitions for habeas corpus. Shelby v. District Court, 82 Nev. 204, 414 P.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TrolsonNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Shelby v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. FuchsNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Carter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Maskaly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Webb v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API