Legal Opinion

Shelby v. Sixth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1966No. 5094PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an original proceeding in prohibition to stay a district court criminal trial upon a grand jury indictment. A transcript of the testimony of the witnesses, who appeared before the grand jury, was not prepared. The petitioner, who is in custody, contends that the jurisdiction of the district court to proceed further is not shown to exist, absent a transcript of the testimony before the grand jury upon which the indictment was returned. We heretofore issued an alternative writ staying proceedings below until we could give due consideration to the issue…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. FuchsNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Application of BeasleyNevada Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Seim v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mears v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kinsey v. Sheriff, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kussman v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Azbill v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API