Legal Opinion

People v. Channer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not denied her statutory right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.30 [1] [a]). The People established that, from the commencement of the criminal action on January 30, 1992 until the arraignment on October 22, 1992, defendant’s location was unknown and could not be determined by due diligence (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [c]; People v Delaronde, 201 AD2d 846). Thus, that period of delay is excludable from the period within which the People were required to be ready for trial (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [c]). Because only 62 days of delay preceding the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. DelarondeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JARVIS, KHARYE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API