Legal Opinion
Homan v. City of Reading
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 1998No. Civil Action 96-7782PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sandra Homan and Kevin Scott (“Homan” and “Scott” respectively, or “Plaintiffs” collectively) brought this action against Defendants City of Reading (the “City” or “Defendant”), Board of Health of the City of Reading (the “Board”), and Council of the City of Reading (the “Council”) 1 seeking compensatory and punitive damages and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 1983. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the following reasons, the motion…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Professional Dog Breeders Advisory Council, Inc. v. WolffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Greco v. SenchakDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- BILLY BOY REAL ESTATE LLC v. UPPER MERION TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- PROFESSIONAL DOG BREEDERS ADVISORY COUN. v. WolffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Valdivia v. CITY OF VILLISCADistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2001