Legal Opinion
Howard v. Group Hospital Service
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 28, 1984No. CIV-80-733-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion For Taxing Of Costs And Attorney Fees filed herein, and after said Motion has been briefed and oral arguments heard thereon, the Court finds that said Motion should be denied in its entirety for reasons hereinafter set forth.
COSTS
The Motion does not seek costs incurred in connection with the District Court trial as the same have been claimed, settled by the Clerk of this Court, not appealed and paid. This was affirmed at arguments.
The Motion does cover appellate costs. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cornwall v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Schmidt v. National Organization for WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1983
- Lloyde E. Howard v. Group Hospital Service, an Oklahoma Corporation, D/B/A Blue Cross and Blue Shield of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consumers Power Co. v. United States Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
- McKelvy v. Metal Container Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1989