State v. Cenac
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1ConcurrenceFournet, Chief Justice
Ordinarily, when an application for a writ to review a decision of an inferior court is denied by a majority of the members of this court, the minority views are not reduced to writing, and inasmuch as under our rules an application for rehearing of our action on a writ is never considered, such views have little, if any, value. This is particularly true in the instant case since a review of the previous decisions of this court upon which the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit based its decree here will readily disclose that the issues posed in the above entitled case are identical in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- California Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- California Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Fred Kuchenig v. The California CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.