Legal Opinion

Goger v. Voecks

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1953No. 33290PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff Herbert A. Goger brought this action to rescind and cancel an exchange of his real estate and promissory note with defendant Herbert A. Voecks for a going common carrier petroleum transport business together with its equipment and state and federal operational permits. Leona E. Voecks was made a party defendant only because she was the spouse of defendant, Herbert A. Voecks, and she is not otherwise involved in this litigation.

Plaintiff substantially alleged in his petition that he was induced to make the exchange by fraudulent representations of defendant Herbert A. Voecks. Insofar…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of ChadronNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jakway v. ProudfitNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Markel v. MoudyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Bradway v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Musgrove v. EskilsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. BERGMAN BY HARRE v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Zenker v. ZenkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Marguerite M. Griffin v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity in the Liquidation of the Gering National Bank and Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Gomez v. State Ex Rel. LarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API