Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. Chisum

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 2004No. 97,479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

¶ 1 The Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS) appeals from an order granting Billy Jo Chisum’s motion to vacate a support order that was based upon his execution of an affidavit of paternity. The trial judge concluded Chisum established a material mistake of fact under 10 O.S.Supp.1999 § 70. We reject DHS’ arguments that § 70 may not be applied under the circumstances of this case and affirm the trial court’s order.

¶ 2 The child, A, was born out of wedlock on June 7, 1999, and Chisum signed a voluntary acknowledgement of paternity that same day. Chisum stated under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Parks v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Monmouth County Division of Social Services v. R.K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. State ex rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. J.P.M. v. T.D.M.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jpm v. TdmMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
  5. Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API