Legal Opinion

National Fruit Product Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 26, 1952No. 278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, Chief Judge.

This is an action for the refund of excess profits tax paid by the plaintiff for its fiscal year ending June 30, 1946. The parties have filed in the record a stipulation of facts and, rio additional evidence having been offered, the facts set out in the stipulation are to be taken as those found by the court. From this stipulation the following appears..

The taxpayer kept its books on an accrual basis and filed its tax returns on the basis of a fiscal year ending June 30th. Following the fiscal year ending June 30, 1946, the taxpayer duly filed its income and excess profits…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reo Motors, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flory Milling Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. National Fruit Product Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  3. Ambassador Hotel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  4. North Star Woolen Mill Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Flory Milling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API