Legal Opinion

Reo Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1950No. 59PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson

An asserted conflict between the decision below and that of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Commissioner v. Moore, Inc., 151 F. 2d 527, made this an appropriate case for our review on writ of certiorari. A recital of the facts must precede definition of the issue.

Petitioner is a Michigan corporation engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles. On February 1, 1941, Reo Sales Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary, was dissolved and all of its assets, subject to all its liabilities, were transferred to petitioner. At the date of dissolution, Reo Sales was indebted to petitioner in an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reo Motors, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  2. Commissioner v. Moore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. Reo Motors, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Reo Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  3. In Re the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between Lummus Co. & Commonwealth Oil Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Christian v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kent v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API