Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenship

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1976No. 9984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Defendant Elmer Gene Blankenship was found guilty by a Wayne County jury of stealing a hog 1 and his punishment was fixed at three years imprisonment. In this appeal he assigns as error two instances of prosecutorial misconduct in argument, the court’s failure to substitute a juror, the composition of the jury panel and the use of his confession in evidence. We affirm.

We have examined the argument portion of the transcript and find no error calling for reversal. The defendant’s objection to what he considered an implication by the prosecutor that the latter knew facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. LangSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. State v. BibeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. CusumanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. LenzaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. CummingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. MabryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API