Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Patrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1979No. 473PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Mr. Justice Nix, joined by Mr. Chief Justice Eagen and Mr. Justice O’Brien, filed an Opinion in Support of Remand and would remand the case for an evidentiary hearing to ascertain whether the Commonwealth had met the due diligence requirement of Criminal Procedure Rule 1100(c).

Mr. Justice Roberts, joined by Mr. Justice Manderino, filed an Opinion in Support of Discharge and would discharge the appellant, being satisfied that a Rule 1100 violation has been established on the record presently before the Court.

Mr. Justice Larsen filed a dissent wherein he would affirm the judgment of…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. ChumleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. RiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. CullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API