Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Steiglitz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1875Published

Error to the District Court of Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In the Common Pleas, Steiglitz, assignee of J. Smal, brought an action on an account of $968.75, for goods sold by Smal October 9, and November 3, 1866, on a credit of six months. Smal was a resident of, and doing business in the State of New York, and becoming insolvent, made an assignment of certain property, including this account, on the 11th of December, 1866, in trust for creditors, giving certain preferences, as allowed by the laws of that state.

The defendant, a citizen of Ohio, makes no formal objection to the plaintiff’s capacity to sue as such assignee. He makes no defense to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ingraham v. GeyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Guillander v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Martin v. . KunzmullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Dundas v. BowlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1844

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API