Legal Opinion

Kordich v. Marine Clerks Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1983No. 83-5671PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Merrill, Schultz, Hersh & Stoll represented the plaintiffs in this action at *1393the time that a motion for a temporary restraining order was filed. Appellant seeks to challenge the district court’s orders imposing sanctions on the firm and its clients because the court found the motion to be frivolous.

The appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant contends that an order compelling a non-party to pay attorney fees and costs is immediately appealable as a final order. We agree. Reygo Pacific Corp. v. Johnston Pump Co., 680 F.2d 647 (9th Cir.1982). It is equally true,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reygo Pacific Corporation, J. David Franklin, Non-Party-Appellant v. Johnston Pump CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Johnny Pflocks, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Eastern Maico Distributors, Inc. v. Maico-FahrzeugfabrikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Algeran, Inc. v. Advance Ross Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United Energy Owners Committee, Inc., and Robert T. Gilleran v. United States Energy Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Harmston v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. K.V. Mart Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 324Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Sanders Associates, Inc. And Calcomp. Inc. v. Summagraphics Corporation, and James David JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API