Legal Opinion
McQuarrie v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 26, 1983No. C9-82-1510PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Respondents brought this declaratory judgment action against Waseca Mutual Insurance Company (Waseca) to determine whether Waseca provided concurrent coverage under a fire insurance policy on respondents’ home. Waseca appeals from the trial court’s conclusion that the Waseca policy was in effect on March 13, 1981, when respondents’ home was destroyed by fire.
In October 1980, respondent Michael McQuarrie called Lynn Boyton’s House of Insurance to obtain fire insurance on his newly constructed home located in rural Big Fork. Boyton asked McQuarrie several questions over the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Franklin v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Cormican v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Lievers v. National Insurance UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Merchants & Farmers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. KorengoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hansen Housing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Ophus v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- National Credit Union Administration Board v. CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Byman v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- National Credit Union Administration Board v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.