Legal Opinion

Youngs v. Ball

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1839PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the district court of Erie county. Daniel Youngs against G. Johnston Ball. Writ of error by each party. The case is very fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by •

Kennedy, J.

This action was brought in the court below by Youngs, as the endorsee of a negotiable note, made by A. C. Tuttle, for the payment of 750 dollars, to G. Johnston Ball, the defendant below, or order ninety days after the date thereof, being the 16th day of April, 1S39, at the office of the Bank of the United States, at Erie, against Ball as the endorser of it. The note in suit, as it appears, was taken by the Bank of the United States at their office in Erie, where it was made payable in renewal of a note, of the same amount, made, endorsed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pender v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Russ v. SadlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Coolidge v. WigginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
  4. Gillespie v. CampbellU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API