Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Nasera

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 26, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00635Unknown

1Opinion

2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 TRELLIS QUINN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00635-MMD-NJK 7 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER (SAC) v. 8 GABRIELA NASERA, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 I. SUMMARY 12 On June 5, 2024, the Court issued an order screening pro se Plaintiff Trellis 13 Quinn’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 7.) The 14 screening order deferred a decision on Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, 15 dismissed the FAC without prejudice for including improperly joined claims, and granted 16 Plaintiff leave to amend. (Id.)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API