Legal Opinion

Chemical Producers & Distributors Ass'n v. Helliker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 30, 2006No. 04-56318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WAKE, District Judge.

We must decide whether intervening amendments to California’s pesticide registration laws, which were challenged and upheld below, render this appeal moot. We hold they do. Because the amendments cannot be attributed to the voluntary conduct of the party seeking relief from the judgment, we vacate the district court’s judgment.

I. Federal and California Pesticide Regulation

Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136 to 136y (“FIFRA”), all pesticides must be registered with the Environmental Protection Agency before being sold or…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chemical Producers and Distributors Ass'n v. HellikerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API