Chemical Producers & Distributors Ass'n v. Helliker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WAKE, District Judge.
We must decide whether intervening amendments to California’s pesticide registration laws, which were challenged and upheld below, render this appeal moot. We hold they do. Because the amendments cannot be attributed to the voluntary conduct of the party seeking relief from the judgment, we vacate the district court’s judgment.
I. Federal and California Pesticide Regulation
Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136 to 136y (“FIFRA”), all pesticides must be registered with the Environmental Protection Agency before being sold or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chemical Producers and Distributors Ass'n v. HellikerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006