Legal Opinion

People v. Ratliff

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1987No. B018433PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

—Following a jury trial the defendant Michael Elvis Ratliff was found guilty of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). It was further found that a principal in the robbery was armed within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022, subdivision (a). He was sentenced to state prison for six years.

He appeals contending (1) that evidence that defendant’s alibi witnesses had not volunteered their information to the police was irrelevant, highly prejudicial and infringed upon defendant’s state constitutional right not to reveal his alibi witnesses to the prosecution, and (2) that he was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. MilanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. People v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API