Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dale

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 8, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

The defendants on separate complaints were convicted of being drunk by the voluntary use of intoxicating liquor, and the defendant Dale was also convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

The mother of the defendant Dale testified without objection, in reply to a question by the district attorney, that her daughter had never taken a drop of liquor in her life. ■ The defendant Dale thereafter took the stand and testified in *537cross-examination that she was not a drinking woman, and then, subject to the defendant’s exception, in answer to a question by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. WakelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Commonwealth v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. FeciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Stuart v. McVeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Commonwealth v. DarchMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. AnalettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Commonwealth v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API