Legal Opinion
People of New York v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 4, 1927No. 311PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Assuming for the moment that the franchise taxes are valid claims against assets in the hands of the receiver, was the state of New York precluded from asserting these claims because of the prior orders entered in the proceedings ? It is clear that the general order of November 6, 1918, limiting the time within which creditors should file claims, would not preclude the state from subsequently presenting its claim for taxes. Employers’ Liability Assur. Corporation v. Astoria Mahogany Co., 6 F.(2d) 945 (C. C. A. 2). As there explained, the effect of such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- New York v. JersawitSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Swarts v. HammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ingels v. BotelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- In Re Jayrose Millinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In Re ZimmermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In Re International Match CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- MacNamee v. Bankers' Union for Foreign Commerce & Finance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.