United States v. William Farrell
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to interpret the phrase “corruptly persuades” in the federal witness tampering statute. That statute *486makes it a crime to attempt to “corruptly persuade” someone in order to “hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense.” 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3). William Farrell was convicted under the statute for attempting to dissuade a coconspirator from providing information to investigators of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- McCormick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Emanuel JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Lynn Michael LaVictorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Vincent R. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. David Wayne HullCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.