Legal Opinion

State v. Godwin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1970No. 2002PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Appellant, Wiley DeWayne Godwin, was convicted of the unlawful furnishing of marijuana in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.-07. The sole issue here is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to require the prosecution, to disclose the name of an informer who was alleged to have heen present at the time the crime was alleged to have been committed.

The State’s case consisted of the testimony of two witnesses: A narcotics agent named Brown who testified that appellant furnished him with marijuana and the chemist who identified the material in question as marijuana.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Honore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MilliganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. EnnisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. State v. TuellArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. RoundtreeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API