Legal Opinion

Scott v. Crawford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1859PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Miami Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

A complaint was filed, in the usual form, upon a note. An answer was filed by one of the defendants, averring that neither of the defendants was a resident of Miami county at the commencement of the suit. On motion of the plaintiff, he thereupon had leave to amend his complaint, which he did by alleging that the note was given for part of the purchase-money of certain real estate in said county, and asking a judgment, and averring and praying the enforcement of his lien as vendor.

The defendant, Nathan Crawford, demurred to the complaint, which demurrer was overruled.

It is insisted that the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wiseman v. HutchinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Huffman v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Citizens State Bank v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API