State v. Devine

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

There was a suggestion by the appellants at the oral argument that the information was void for the reason that it did not appear therefrom that the prosecution was in the name or on behalf of the state. This objection was not made in the brief of appellants, and for that reason they were not entitled to be heard in regard thereto, but in view of the fact that the argument went to the extent of claiming that by reason of such omission the court never had any jurisdiction of the subject matter, it is best that we should pass upon the objection.…