Legal Opinion
Smith v. Eshelman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 13, 1938No. 2 Div. 99PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a bill in equity, and the opinion of the trial judge shows that its sufficiency is challenged on the ground that the facts averred do not constitute a gift causa mortis.
The facts averred which seem to control the questions are succinctly stated as follows :
“James Daniel Caddell, ,in expectation of death then imminent, and a patient at the Baptist Hospital at Selma, Alabama, preparing jto undergo an operation, delivers to Doctor T. C. Cameron' a letter Exhibit A to the Bill of Complaint, requesting Doctor Cameron to open same in case of his (J. D. Caddell’s) death, said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Basket v. HassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- George Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Jones v. DeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Jones v. WeakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Limestone County v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Cannon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Barham v. KhouryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Clark v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Farish v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.