Legal Opinion

Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 7, 2014No. SUCV199806002BLS1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kaplan, Mitchell H., J.

The plaintiffs, Lori Aspinall5 and Thomas Geanacopoulos, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated plaintiffs, now certified, filed this action against the defendant6 Philip Morris USA, Inc. (Philip Morris), alleging unjust enrichment7 and violations of G.L.c. 93A arising from Philip Morris’s use of the term “Lights” and “Lowered Tar & Nicotine” on the packaging of Marlboro Lights cigarettes. The plaintiffs’ third amended class action complaint (complaint), which is the current operative complaint, contains two counts: deceptive and unfair trade…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geanacopoulos v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API