Legal Opinion

Mote v. City of Chelsea

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 19, 2017No. Case Number 16-11546PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT DECREE

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States. District Judge

This case concerns the sidewalks, curbs, and intersections in the City of Chelsea, *645Michigan, and their accessibility to persons with disabilities. The plaintiffs— Shauna Mote and several other disabled individuals, joined by the Ann Arbor Center for Independent Living — filed this lawsuit under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) alleging that the City of Chelsea and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mote v. City of ChelseaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Mote v. City of ChelseaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Acosta v. AllenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
  4. ArmorSource LLC v. KapahDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Cohan v. MMP (Detroit Livonia) PropCo LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API