Legal Opinion

309 Nissan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

Petitioner 309 Nissan (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed, but modified, an order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that granted Employer’s Suspension Petition. We reverse the Board’s modification of the WCJ’s order.

On May 27, 1998, Edward Horowitz (Claimant) sustained a cervical strain or sprain injury, in the course and scope of his work as a car salesman for Employer, when he was involved in a motor vehicle accident during a test drive. Employer thereafter issued a Notice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Nardone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Select Security, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kobrin)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Select Security, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kobrin)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API