Legal Opinion

Paul Callahan v. Kevin Ransom, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 2026No. 2:22-cv-01824Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL CALLAHAN, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-1824 KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. February 27, 2026 Petitioner Paul Callahan filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After full briefing, Magistrate Judge Scott W. Reid entered a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) that the habeas petition be denied in part and dismissed in part.1 Petitioner filed objections to the R&R.2 Respondents filed a response to the objections, to which Petitioner filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API