Legal Opinion

Erland v. Gibbons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Granville Gibbons, from a determination of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of June, 1916, reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan, in defendant’s favor, and granting plaintiff a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

The action is by a real estate broker against a client for commissions claimed to have been earned for effecting an agreement for an exchange of real estate.

Defendant employed plaintiff as a broker to sell certain houses and lots in the city of New York, or to procure an exchange thereof for a farm. Plaintiff found a person who owned a farm at Austerlitz, N. Y., and an agreement was made between the respective owners of the city and country properties for an exchange. The only defense which it is nec*553essary to consider is that based upon the fact that plaintiff had a secret…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knauss v. Gottfried Krueger Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Carman v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Dickinson v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Jacobs v. BeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Douglas Holly, Inc. v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Procidano v. MautnerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  3. Rintel v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API