Legal Opinion
Procidano v. Mautner
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 19, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPatbick J. Picabiello, J.
Plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, sues to recover a brokerage commission allegedly due him under an expressed and/or implied agreement with defendant, a real estate entrepreneur.
*892The facts seem not to be in dispute. The issue to be resolved in this lawsuit is whether or not plaintiff acted for the defendant in his capacity as a licensed real estate broker in the subject transaction and whether or not there emerged therefrom an agreement, expressed or implied, whereby the defendant bound himslf to pay plaintiff a brokerage commission.
It appears that prior to January 8, 1970, plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Elco Shoe Manufacturers, Inc. v. SiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Grossman v. HermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Leonard v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Douglas Holly, Inc. v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990