Legal Opinion

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Randall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1885No. 12,098PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The complaint in this case charged that the appellant, the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railway *454Company, and the appellee Perry A. Randall, on the 15th day of October, 1881, entered into an agreement in writing as follows:

“ This agreement, made this 15th day of October, 1881, by and between Perry A. Randall, party of the first part, and the ■ New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company, party of the second part, witnesseth, That the said party of the first part hereby grants and leases to the said party of the second part the right to construct a railroad track, commonly called a ‘Y,’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Knight v. Indiana Coal & Iron Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Montgomery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Terstegge v. First German Mutual Benevolent SocietyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Bollenbacker v. FrittsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Myers v. MarisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Harry v. HarryIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Spiro v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Mooney-Mueller-Ward, Inc. v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API