Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mervis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1976No. 12880PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simkins

This is an appeal from an order enjoining respondents Mervis and Young from maintaining a recently constructed barrier to certain property over which petitioner Smith claims a prescriptive easement. The disputed parcel runs parallel to what were formerly the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company tracks and is part of the old right of way. It is a lane 30 feet wide and connects two parcels of Smith’s farm property. Smith, or his tenant, has used the strip since 1944 for ingress and egress to and from the second parcel. In 1973, Young and Mervis purchased the right of way from the railroad…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bontz v. StearIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Rush v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. WakefieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Carroll v. RabbermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chicago v. HammondIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wehde v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Lawson v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Bogner v. VilligerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Chicago Title Land Trust Co. v. JS IIAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API