Legal Opinion

Freed-Goodall Furniture Co. v. Morris Plan Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1943No. 31040PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for balance due on debt evidenced by promissory note and to foreclose on collateral security.

The point in controversy in the trial court was whether plaintiff had reserved and collected usurious interest for which defendant counterclaimed. Otherwise there was no question as to the amount.-

Essential facts are that plaintiff was engaged in the business of lending money and also of selling interest-bearing certificates of investment in plaintiff’s company to the investing public. When this particular transaction originated defendant gave plaintiff their note for $10,870…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mesaba Loan Co. v. SherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Simpson v. Smith Savings SocietySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Collins v. Industrial Savings SocietySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. HahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Mondie v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sidney M. Massie, Individually, and Sidney M. Massie, as Executive Officer and Trustee of Massie Development Company v. Rose RubinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  2. Selected Investments Corp. v. Spencer-SedbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Reeves v. First State BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Duck v. Selected Investments Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API